Diferenças regionais e custos dos procedimentos de fisioterapia no Sistema Único de Saúde do Brasil, 1995 a 2008 / Regional differences and costs of physical therapy procedures in Brazil's Unified Health System, 1995 to 2008

OBJETIVO: Descrever os atendimentos ambulatoriais fisioterßpicos prestados pelo Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) no Brasil quanto a sua distribuição geogrßfica, custos, tipos de procedimento e tipos de prestador. MÉTODOS: Foram utilizados dados do Departamento de Informßtica do SUS (DATASUS), referentes ao período de 1995 a 2008, que incluíam a quantidade e o valor dos procedimentos aprovados para pagamento pelas Secretarias de Saúde e a quantidade e o valor dos procedimentos apresentados para pagamento. Os coeficientes de atendimento (CoA) foram calculados dividindo-se o número de atendimentos no ano em uma região pela população estimada no mesmo ano e região. RESULTADOS: O CoA no Brasil em 2008 foi de 0,19 e as regiões Norte e Centro-Oeste apresentaram os menores coeficientes (0,13 e 0,10, respectivamente). Entre 1995 e 2007 houve um crescimento no coeficiente nacional de atendimentos de 33,7 por cento, sendo que a região Norte apresentou o maior aumento, de 143,8 por cento, a Centro-Oeste, de 62,1 por cento, e a Nordeste, de 56,1 por cento. O atendimento nas alterações motoras foi o procedimento mais realizado (61,8 por cento) e os valores de pagamento aprovados foram menores que os apresentados pelos gestores dos serviços em 2008 (10,4 por cento). Estabelecimentos privados com fins lucrativos prestaram 44,5 por cento dos atendimentos fisioterßpicos pagos pelo SUS em 2008. Os estabelecimentos municipais responderam por 26,6 por cento dos atendimentos e os federais por apenas 0,9 por cento. Entre 1995 e 2007, a quantidade de atendimentos oferecidos pelos estabelecimentos municipais cresceu 278,7 por cento. CONCLUSÕES: Observou-se que a oferta de atendimento fisioterßpico ambulatorial pelo SUS ainda é pequena e geograficamente desigual, embora regiões menos desenvolvidas apresentem um maior crescimento no CoA. O SUS remunera inadequadamente os serviços prestados em fisioterapia e ainda o faz, em grande parte, por meio de convênios...

OBJECTIVE: Describe the ambulatory physical therapy treatments provided by the Unified Health System (SUS) in Brazil with regard to their geographical distribution, costs, types of procedure, and types of provider. METHODS: Data from the SUS Information Technology Department (DATASUS) were utilized, drawing from the period from 1995 to 2008, which included the quantity and the value of the procedures approved for payment by the Secretariats of Health and the quantity and value of the procedures presented for payment. The treatment coefficients (CoA) were calculated by dividing the number of treatments in a particular year and region by the estimated population of that region in that year. RESULTS: The CoA in Brazil in 2008 was 0.19 and the North and Center-West regions presented the lowest coefficients (0.13 and 0.10, respectively). Between 1995 and 2007 there was an increase in the national treatment coefficient of 33.7 percent, with the North region showing the largest increase, 143.8 percent; the Center-West 62.1 percent, and the Northeast 56.1 percent. Treatment for motor disorders was the most widely performed procedure (61.8 percent), and the values of payments approved were lower than those presented by the managers of the services in 2008 (10.4 percent). Private for-profit establishments provided 44.5 percent of the physical therapy treatments paid for by the SUS in 2008. Municipal establishments accounted for 26.6 percent of the treatments, and federal establishments for only 0.9 percent. Between 1995 and 2007, the quantity of treatments offered by municipal establishments increased 278.7 percent. CONCLUSIONS: It was observed that the provision of ambulatory physical therapy treatment by the SUS remains small and geographically unequal, although lessdeveloped regions showed a larger increase in the CoA. The SUS remunerates inadequately the physical therapy services provided and continues to do so, in large part, by means of agreements...

Costs of publicly provided maternity services in Rosario, Argentina

OBJECTIVE: This study estimates the costs of maternal health services in Rosario, Argentina. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The provider costs (US$ 1999) of antenatal care, a normal vaginal delivery and a caesarean section, were evaluated retrospectively in two municipal hospitals. The cost of an antenatal visit was evaluated in two health centres and the patient costs associated with the visit were evaluated in a hospital and a health centre. RESULTS: The average cost per hospital day is $114.62. The average cost of a caesarean section ($525.57) is five times greater than that of a normal vaginal delivery ($105.61). A normal delivery costs less at the general hospital and a c-section less at the maternity hospital. The average cost of an antenatal visit is $31.10. The provider cost is lower at the health centre than at the hospital. Personnel accounted for 72-94 percent of the total cost and drugs and medical supplies between 4-26 percent. On average, an antenatal visit costs women $4.70. Direct costs are minimal compared to indirect costs of travel and waiting time. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the potential for increasing the efficiency of resource use by promoting antenatal care visits at the primary level. Women could also benefit from reduced travel and waiting time. Similar benefits could accrue to the provider by encouraging normal delivery at general hospitals, and complicated deliveries at specialised maternity hospitals

Costo de las prestaciones de salud / Cost of health deliveries

The income source and the use of assets at the Health Department of a Chilean city hall was studied. A cost control system was created to know the real value of health services, which were compared with the administrative tariffs determined by the authorities. Specific health programs such as complementary feeding, immunizations and responsible paternity programs represented 48.1 percent of the Health Department expenses. Ninety four percent of services had a real cost that exceeded their administrative price. A reformulation of resource distribution for primary health care and the development of control systems that measure the results of experience activities is proposed